its mobilization in the 2008 United States presidential campaign, Twitter became the ultimate multi-purpose tool for journalists. Reporters routinely use the platform as a means of outreaching, networking, reporting and promoting.
Citizen journalists famously tweeted their way through the Arab spring, using social media to organize protests and raise awareness about civil unrest.
Those working for mainstream media outlets use the app for audience curation. Scott Bryan, who co-hosts a podcast for BBC Sounds, recently wrote about building a career on Twitter.
“These days, I report things the moment they happen in easy-to-follow threads,” said Bryan. “My tweets show editors and producers what I’m knowledgeable about and have led to invitations to go on radio and TV.”
Nicole Blanchett, an associate professor at Toronto Metropolitan University’s School of Journalism, attests to the platform’s usefulness.
“I’ve often said to students in production classes that before something hits the news wires, I know the story breaks because I’m seeing it on my Twitter feed,” said Blanchett.
Knowing Twitter’s significance within – and oftentimes beyond – the media apparatus, Blanchett assigns a mandatory live-tweeting activity to better anchor first-year students navigating the field.
Scott Martin, who took Blanchett’s course in 2021, said he received multiple freelance writing offers through Twitter.
But, Twitter’s future as a writer’s resource is not guaranteed. Bryan said he worries about developments in the company’s acquisition ending the digital ecosystem that once helped him thrive in the industry.
The takeover and its aftermath
Business magnate Elon Musk bought out Twitter for $44 billion on Oct. 27, 2022.
“The reason I acquired Twitter is because it is important to the future of civilization to have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner, without resorting to violence,” wrote Musk that morning.
According to NBC News, the deal concluded after months of legal battles and mass layoffs.
Controversy ensued post-acquisition.
One of Musk’s first renovations was Twitter Blue, a subscription service costing USD$7.99 per month. Subscribers received a blue tick by their name – a symbol which formerly represented identity verification.
It wasn’t long before users with newly verified accounts impersonated public figures.
For instance, a profile parodying pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly posted a tweet falsely advertising free insulin. The claim spread for hours, resulting in a misinformation scandal that incited an exorbitant plummet of the Lilly (LLY) stock.
Other verified accounts included parodies of Ontario Premier Doug Ford, Tesla and Jesus.
The rollout of Twitter Blue has since paused. But as Reuters reports, it may return on Nov. 29, 2022.
Despite the promise of an improved subscription service, future journalists worry about long-term effects of its first rollout.
“I think the readers following the unending nonsense at Twitter will absolutely question the reputability of articles after the blue check fiasco,” said Martin in an email correspondence.
Others question how the revamped subscription will serve Musk’s goal of democratising journalism.
Journalism student Fatima Raza said Twitter’s prioritizing of subscribed journalists in replies, mentions and searches creates a bias toward those who can afford $8 per month.
According to Musk, this new Twitter will uplift citizen journalism – a form of reporting and analysis of news conducted by the general public.